Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP Senior Associate Ryan Fraser reports that high-ranking DOJ officials have announced a program in the works to improve the incentives to blow the whistle on large-scale corporate misconduct. The False Claims Act already provides monetary compensation to individuals who report fraud victimizing the federal government as a payor. (Field-specific agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission, also have their own whistleblower-rewards programs.) The news revealed by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco is that whistleblowers on big corporate misdeeds harming victims other than the federal government will stand to be paid from resulting forfeiture funds under a program that will launch formally later in 2024. For now, it’s a “90-day sprint” for various components of the DOJ to figure out in more detail how it will work.

Some important requirements, though, are already public. Acting Assistant AG Nicole Argentieri clarified that the new program will reward whistleblowers only if they submit “original, non-public, truthful information not already known to the department, and only when that information is provided voluntarily and not in response to any government inquiry, preexisting reporting obligation, or imminent threat of disclosure.” The DOJ hopes this and other related policies will motivate actors who have important information on big corporate misconduct to race to be the government’s first source.

As a firm with expertise in whistleblower cases, investigations, and white-collar criminal defense, BKLW will be eyeing these developments closely.

Read more:

Related Insights

Feb 26, 2026 BKLW News

SEC Enforcement Manual 2026: Key Updates for Individuals Facing SEC Investigations and Whistleblowers

On February 24, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission released an updated Enforcement Manual—its first comprehensive revision since 2017. Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP has analyzed the changes in detail to...
Feb 23, 2026 BKLW News

AI and Privilege: What United States v. Heppner Means for Clients Facing Federal Investigation

In an opinion issued February 17, 2026, Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York ruled that communications between a criminal defendant and a generative AI platform not directed by counsel are not protected by...
Feb 06, 2026 BKLW News

Court further trims L.A. Times petition in landmark public records case against City of L.A.

The intersection of California’s Public Records Act (“PRA”)and record-retention statutes is generating significant legal developments. On January 15, 2026, the California Supreme Court decided City of Gilroy v....