After five years of contested litigation the Supreme Court granted our petition, vacated our client's conviction, and remanded to the Ninth Circuit.

At issue was the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act ("NFA"), a 1934 law that strongly discouraged, but did not outright ban, machine guns and other particularly dangerous weapons.  At the time the law was passed Congress believed, based on the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, that the federal government had no power to regulate firearms.  That power (thought of as the "police power") was reserved to the states.  So rather than banning machine guns Congress relied on its power to tax.  The 1934 tax due for possession of a machine gun was $200.  That's nearly $4,000 in today's dollars.

So much for that idea.  Congress has since relied on its Commerce Clause authority to regulate firearms, home-grown marijuana, and just about anything else.  In 1986 Congress banned the possession of all machine guns.  But Congress left the NFA's prohibition on unregistered machine gun possession on the books.  Even though the United States Attorney's Manual instructs prosecutors to charge machine gun possession under the new law, the government continued to charge some people (including our client) with possessing unregistered machine guns under the NFA.  

Here's the problem.  Ever since 1986 the government refuses to register previously unregistered machine guns (or collect the tax, which is still only $200).  Because the government refuses to collect tax payments for those machine guns, the NFA no longer generates revenue by regulating them.  And a tax law loses its constitutional justification when it no longer raises revenue.   

If that argument sounds familiar it's because it's precisely the same one that a coalition of states is making in a challenge to the Affordable Care Act.  And the executive branch agrees with them. 

The government appears to agree with BKLW too.  While this case was pending in the Supreme Court, the US Attorney's office abruptly moved to dismiss it.  

Big win for BKLW Partner John Littrell.  Not so much a gun nut, more of a constitution nut.   

Read More:

Related Insights

Oct 30, 2026 Case Successes

BKLW secures non-custodial sentence, $200 fine for client charged with nationwide rental fraud scheme

Last fall, a BKLW team led by partners Ryan Fraser and Reuben Camper Cahn replaced the second of two prior distinguished firms in the ongoing representation of a man who was charged in a January 2024 indictment with wire...
Oct 24, 2026 Case Successes

Senior associate Olivia Weber recognized for Pro Bono success for an Eaton fire evacuee

We are proud to share that senior associate Olivia Weber has been selected to receive Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County’s (NLSLA) Wildfire Recovery/Disaster Pro Bono Award for her work on behalf of an...
Oct 29, 2025 Case Successes

BKLW secures fraction of DOJ-recommended sentence for client following five-week federal trial

On October 28, 2025, following a five-week federal criminal jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP successfully secured its client a...