In July 2019, Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams’s client obtained a judgment and attorney’s fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 of more than $3 million against a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department detective after a jury trial.  BKLW’s client presented evidence at trial, including video recordings, demonstrating that the baseless arrest was orchestrated by the detective and the culmination of a multi-year campaign of harassment against BKLW’s client.

A few months after the judgment was entered, the detective filed a chapter 11 bankruptcy case. Through the bankruptcy, the detective sought to discharge the entire judgment, or at a minimum pay pennies on the dollar. Shortly after the bankruptcy case was filed, the BKLW team moved to dismiss the bankruptcy case as being filed in bad faith. The bankruptcy court agreed with the arguments BKLW presented and dismissed the detective’s bankruptcy case, with an express finding of bad faith. A copy of the bankruptcy court’s decision granting BKLW’s motion to dismiss can be found here.

After prevailing on the motion to dismiss, BKLW filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs for all amounts their client incurred in connection with the detective’s bankruptcy case. The court initially issued a tentative ruling indicating it would deny the motion based on a lack of jurisdiction. During oral argument, BKLW raised arguments and cited authority the bankruptcy court had not considered.  After considering BKLW's arguments, the bankruptcy court reversed its tentative ruling, granted the fee motion, and entered judgment in favor of BKLW's client for nearly $50,000. A copy of the bankruptcy court’s decision granting BKLW’s fee motion can be found here.

“We get many clients who get dragged into bankruptcy court after winning a large judgment or while litigating a case where the opposing side has substantial exposure,” says BKLW partner Tony Bisconti.  Bisconti added, “unfortunately, in a number of cases, the bankruptcies are filed by parties who try to change the playing field to bankruptcy court as a litigation strategy, particularly if they are unhappy with the results they are getting in the other forum. In those situations, a proactive and aggressive approach is critical to avoid prolonging the litigation for years and threatening the viability of any judgment or impending judgment.”

BKLW’s experienced bankruptcy group represents clients’ rights in all aspects of the bankruptcy process. Our unique backgrounds include the former United States Trustee for five judicial districts, federal prosecutors, federal public defenders, and former judicial clerks for bankruptcy judges across the Central District of California. 

Related Insights

Jun 29, 2024 Case Successes

Anti-child trafficking rescuer dismissed with prejudice from alleged abuse case

On June 27, 2024, a Utah Court dismissed all claims against Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP’s client Timothy Ballard with prejudice. BKLW partners Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. and Whitney Z. Bernstein, associates Alexis...
May 14, 2024 Case Successes

Motion to dismiss secured for high-profile client in alleged abuse case

On May 9, 2024, a Utah Court dismissed the case against Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP’s client Katherine Ballard with prejudice under Utah’s newly enacted Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (Utah.Stat. §...
Nov 23, 2023 Case Successes

BKLW wins defense verdict for client accused of conspiring to steal biomedical trade secrets

Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP scored a complete victory at trial for its client Nathan Boulais, who had been accused of violating, and conspiring with others to violate, the federal civil RICO statute based on...